Cases 71 - 80 of 454
Mason v. Preston Smith Officials
as 5:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rios v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
John Gabriel Rios
Defendant:
State of Texas, Lynn County Sheriff's Office, Joshua Rocha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00914
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Bill E. Waybourn, Tarrant County Sheriff, Mr. Iceom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2022cv00913
Petitioner:
Maurice Henry Mason
Respondent:
Bill E. Waybourn and Tarrant County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mason v. RBC Capital Markets, LLC
as 4:2022cv03454
Plaintiff:
Todd Victor Mason
Defendant:
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Washington v. Bethel Baptist Church et al
as 6:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Marvin Goodlow Washington
Defendant:
Bethel Baptist Church, Bethel Empowerment Church, The House of God & Gates of Heaven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mason v. Riscky's Barbeque
as 4:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Riscky's Barbeque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Wayburn
as 4:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Maurice Henry Mason
Defendant:
Bill Wayburn, Bill E. Wayburn and Tarrant County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mason v. Braum's, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Amos Mason
Defendant:
Braum's, Inc. and Braum's Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
