Cases 71 - 80 of 46,577
KLC Financial, Inc. v. Buck, Kenneth
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
KLC Financial, Inc.
Defendant:
Kenneth Michael Buck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fischer-Hamilton v. Hepp
as 2:2024cv00663
Petitioner:
Demonte Fischer-Hamilton
Respondent:
Randall Hepp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estate of Ronquale M Ditello Scott Jr v. Racine County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Heather Blersch
Defendant:
Racine County Sheriff's Department, Christopher Schmaling, MEnD Correctional Care PLLC and others
Other:
Ronquale Ditello Scott Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ducksworth v. Eplett et al
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Brian Armon Ducksworth
Defendant:
Cheryl Eplett, S Feltes, Sgt Dellfoss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Defendant:
Lt Fisher, Captain Remarkiwitcz, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Szalewski v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Kent Szalewski
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Morales v. Ross-Marinowski et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Robert Xavier Morales
Defendant:
LT Tanya Ross-Marinowski, CO Hanson, CO John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. COAF WI RTC et al
as 2:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Fernando Adams
Defendant:
COAF WI RTC and Capital One Auto Finance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
