Cases 71 - 80 of 2,733
Tucker v. U.S Bank Trust National Association et al
as 7:2023cv00713
Plaintiff:
Doris E. Tucker
Defendant:
U.S Bank Trust National Association, Selene Finance, L.P. and Jennifer Iarocci, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rainey v. United States
as 2:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Donnie E. Rainey, II
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wilson v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00687
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke and Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ofori v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Artrip et al
as 7:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Davis et al
as 7:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
T.B. Smith, B.J. Ravizee, M.D. Powers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seay et al v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Marilyn E Seay Propst, Charles Propst, Kathy Propst and others
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Jerry Moore, Jeff Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
Christopher E. Wilson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
