Cases 71 - 80 of 132
Mitchell v. Mays et al
as 2:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
Samuel H. Mays, Jr., Bernice Bouie Donald, Tony R. Arvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Merriner et al v. Blackwelder et al
as 1:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Justin Kyle Merriner and Raven Ashli Contreras
Defendant:
Murray Blackwelder and Troy Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mitchell v. United States
as 2:2012cv02930
Plaintiff:
Stephen Murray Mitchell
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Blue Point One, LLC v. Beard et al
as 1:2012cv00343
Plaintiff:
Blue Point One, LLC
Defendant:
Jes Beard, John M. McDonald, Hypo Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Lucas v. Correct Care Solution et al
as 2:2012cv02506
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Cortez Lucas
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution, White, Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Eady v. Young et al
as 4:2012cv00028
Defendant:
Drew Young , Murray Blackwelder , Lincoln County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald D. Eady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2012cv00410
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Murray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee; et al
as 2:2012cv02258
Plaintiff:
Murray Wilson , Chris Collins , Kevin Perry and others
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee and Memphis Police Department
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
