Cases 71 - 80 of 1,350
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
HOLLIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv00895
Plaintiff:
leo hollis
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMISIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, Warden NANCY GIANETTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MUNFORD-ROBINSON
as 2:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIA MUNFORD-ROBINSON
Defendant:
CVS and CVS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARVEY v. FOLLY et al
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
HOLLY HARVEY
Defendant:
KEVIN M FOLLY and SHANNON A ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT et al
as 2:2022cv05213
Plaintiff:
TYSHEED DAVIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY RECRUIT, PENNSYLVANIA BAR INSURANCE FUND, PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Sholley et al
as 1:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Brewer
Defendant:
Judge Sholley, Judge Reed, District Attorney Michael Piecuch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
