Cases 71 - 80 of 823
Robinson v. City of Richmond Police Department
as 3:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City of Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. City Attorney
as 3:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Clayton Robinson
Defendant:
City Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, D. Rose, Brian Vanover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jamison v. Robinson et al
as 3:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
David Robinson, Natarcha Gregg, M.S.A, RD and Paul Ohia, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Frost et al
as 7:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trevor Andrew Jones
Defendant:
Barbara Frost, Michael Berry, D. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Robinson v. Tidwater Regional Jail
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
Keishon Robinson
Defendant:
Tidewater Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estes v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Estes
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Greenrock Correctional Center, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00627
Petitioner:
Aaron Christopher Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
