Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Global Asset Recovery v. DiGiuseppe, Jr. et al
as 2:2014cv13681
Plaintiff:
Global Asset Recovery
Defendant:
John J. DiGiuseppe, Jr. , Vincenza M. DiGiuseppe , John DiGiuseppe, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keith Bunch Associates LLC v. La-Z-Boy, Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv13665
Plaintiff:
Keith Bunch Associates LLC
Defendant:
La-Z-Boy, Incorporated, La-Z-Boy Global Limited, Hydropool Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MY Imagination, LLC v. M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13321
Plaintiff:
MY Imagination, LLC
Defendant:
M.Z. Berger & Co., Inc. , M Z Berger & Co, Incorporated and MZB Imagination, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Cadez v. Melvindale, City of et al
as 2:2014cv12604
Plaintiff:
Jordan Ashly Cadez
Defendant:
Melvindale, City of, Chad Hayes, Bajorek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
La-Z-Boy, Incorporated v. Georgian Galleries, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11928
Plaintiff:
La-Z-Boy, Incorporated
Defendant:
Georgian Galleries, Inc., Kenneth Z Weiss and Saralouise Weiss
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
FirstMerit Bank, N.A. v. Edgewood Commons, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00450
Plaintiff:
FirstMerit Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Edgewood Commons, LLC, Kin Tak Cheng, Shiu Haw Li Cheng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv11227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Moses
as 2:2013mc51733
Respondent:
David Z. Moses
Petitioner:
United States of America
United States of America v. Moses
as 2:2013mc51734
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
David Z. Moses
Z & H Groesbeck Service Center Inc. v. United States of America et al
as 2:2013cv12589
Plaintiff:
Z & H Groesbeck Service Center Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America, Vicky Robinson and Tom Vilsack
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
