Cases 71 - 80 of 2,454
ADAME BARAJAS et al v. SAM'S EAST INC. et al
as 5:2023cv03836
Plaintiff:
MARIA ADAME BARAJAS and ALVARO LEMUS PEREZ
Defendant:
SAM'S EAST INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
MURSE v. MURSE
as 5:2023cv03829
Plaintiff:
ADAM I. MURSE
Defendant:
MARY L. MURSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 2:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Adelphoi USA
as 5:2023cv03684
Plaintiff:
Jahmir Adams, Jeremy Lee Hensel, Danny Jesus Ruiz and others
Defendant:
Adelphoi USA and John/Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PICONE v. USA
as 2:2023cv01681
Petitioner:
ADAM ROBERT LEE PICONE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ADAMS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03643
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADAMS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Talbert v. Shapiro et al
as 3:2023cv01544
Petitioner:
Charles Talbert
Respondent:
Josh Shapiro, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Culley v. Adams et al
as 1:2023cv01513
Petitioner:
Joshua Michael Culley
Respondent:
Melinda Adams and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAMES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv03369
Plaintiff:
ELIAS ADAMES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. ADAMS
as 2:2023cv03309
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP ADDRESS 100.34.65.217 and TONY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
