Cases 71 - 80 of 1,159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Daniel Grant v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03141
Plaintiff:
Daniel Grant
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
NLRB v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 24-1619
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simon Haines v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Petitioner:
Simon Unsworth Haines
Respondent:
Amazon.com Services LLC and Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
In Re: Baby Food Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2024md03101
Plaintiff:
VZ, D. P. U., Z.W. and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Hain Celestial Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniel Boyle v. Amazon.com Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02968
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boyle
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, AMAZON DELIVERY SERVICE PARTNER, Amazon Fulfillment Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
