Cases 71 - 80 of 525
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15293
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13310
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ANTHONY SMITH and JOSHUA A SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11836
Plaintiff:
STEVEN ANTHONY SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vedrine v. Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2022at00549
Plaintiff:
Reginald Vedrine
Defendant:
Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC and Marshall Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Vedrine v. Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00902
Plaintiff:
Reginald Vedrine
Defendant:
Swift Transportation of Arizona, LLC and Marshall Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
PURNELL v. SFOGLIA et al
as 1:2022cv02108
Plaintiff:
MARCUS PURNELL
Defendant:
DENNIS SFOGLIA, JOHN JESKIE, ANTHONY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Smith
as 8:2022cv01604
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Wayne Carter
Defendant:
Jack Anthony Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Smith v. Dodd et al
as 3:2022cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Rachell Dodd, Lance Ellington, J. Caywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. RIEBEN et al
as 4:2022cv00150
Defendant:
JACOB RIEBEN, Sheriff ANTHONY SMITH, CLIFFORD CARROLL and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRIE REENEA JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
JONES v. SMITH et al
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
SHERRIE REENEA JONES
Defendant:
ANTHONY SMITH, JACOB RIEBEN and CLIFFORD CARROLL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
