Cases 71 - 80 of 306
Booth v. McMaster et al
as 0:2021cv01466
Defendant:
James Lucas, Bryan P. Stirling, G. Murrell Smith jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bronson Shelley v. Bryan Stirling
as 21-6752
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS PATTERSON, In their individual capacity, J. MICHAEL BROWN, In their individual capacity and BRYAN P. STIRLING, In their individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRONSON SHELLEY
Hattar v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01120
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Solieman Hattar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bessellieu v. Bone et al
as 8:2021cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ty'shun Mario Ka'l Bessellieu
Defendant:
Shep Bone, Warden of Lee Correctional Institution, Sergeant Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodruff v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01108
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01106
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Shadrian Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01105
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Uniqueqa James and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01109
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Joseph Stines and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01107
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Uniqueqa James, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jenkins and Deloris Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv01091
Defendant:
Sam Ray, Marquita McCullough, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Reakwon Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
