Cases 71 - 80 of 154
Sexton v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2016cv02144
Plaintiff:
Carl R Sexton
Defendant:
Peoria, City of , Roy Minter , Unknown Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Arizona Theranos Incorporated Litigation
as 2:2016cv02138
Plaintiff:
Toy and Kimberly Toy
Defendant:
Theranos Incorporated, Ramesh Balwani, Walgreens Boots Alliance Incorporated and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
R.C., L.T., B.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Chiago v. USA
as 4:2016cv00347
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shane Bobby Chiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fitch et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Lisa Fitch and Bobby Fitch
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyler #213777 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00252
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tyler, III
Defendant:
Unknown Cerna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Purcell #147003 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv01316
Petitioner:
Bobby Purcell
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tatum v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv00711
Petitioner:
Bobby Jerry Tatum
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Janus Spectrum LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00609
Defendant:
Janus Spectrum LLC, David Alcorn, Kent Maerki and others
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jones et al v. Loan Correspondents Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv00215
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dean Jones, Janet Kathleen Jones and Darrin C Lavine
Defendant:
Bank of America NA , BAC Home Loans Servicing LP , Bank of New York Mellon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
