Cases 71 - 80 of 1,866
Kelly v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 1:2024cv00975
Defendant:
CDCR Officer Robert Amacker, State of California and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Connie J. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Dixon v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2024cv00954
Defendant:
CDCR, C. Pfeiffer, Dewitt and others
Plaintiff:
Delshon Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-4953
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Former CDCR Secretary, M. POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, KILOUGH and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN FLOURNOY
(PC) Gardner v. CDCR et al
as 1:2024cv00933
Defendant:
D. Martinez, G. Geels, J. Guzman Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Owen Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Storm v. Office of the California Governor, et al.
as 1:2024cv00917
Defendant:
B. Phillips, CDCR Secretary, Gavin Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
Dimitri Z. Storm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gowdy v. Via Path et al
as 3:2024cv04772
Defendant:
Via Path and CDCR California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Carl Eugene Gowdy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Marion II et al
as 1:2024at00583
Defendant:
Carl Bently Marion II and CDCR HQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sonier v. CDCR et al
as 3:2024cv04567
Plaintiff:
Markkis Porsche Sonier
Defendant:
CDCR, Castillo and LT C. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Romell Bedford v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv06360
Defendant:
CDCR and Sgt. Acosta
Plaintiff:
Justin Romell Bedford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moralez v. Davis, et al.
as 24-4552
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH MORALEZ
Defendant:
RALPH DIAZ, Secretary CDCR, RON BROOMFIELD, Warden (A) SQ, RON DAVIS, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.