Cases 71 - 80 of 137
JOHNSON v. P.I.C.C. PRISON et al
as 2:2012cv05001
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Defendant:
P.I.C.C. PRISON and CITY OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. PHILA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv04922
Plaintiff:
MORRIS MORGAN, III
Defendant:
PHILA PRISON SYSTEM, THE CITY OF PHILA and THE WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JEFFERSON v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 2:2012cv04610
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. JEFFERSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., PICC and CITY OF PHILA.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2012cv02269
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA., CFCF, PHILA, PRISON SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILA. et al
as 2:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN JACKSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA. and PHILA. PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEDER v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2012cv01471
Plaintiff:
RICARDO REEDER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA and PHILA PRISON SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORGAN v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2012cv00756
Plaintiff:
EVAN GARRETT MORGAN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, JOHN P. DELANEY, LOUIS GIORIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAWRENCE v. MENTAL - HEALTH DOCTOR et al
as 2:2012cv00642
Plaintiff:
LIONEL S LAWRENCE, SR.
Defendant:
MENTAL - HEALTH DOCTOR, CRIMINAL JUSTICE CENTER, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS JUDICAL-CHAMBERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
HOLLOWAY v. CITY OF PHILA et al
as 2:2011cv07892
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY HOLLOWAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILA, GIORLA, JANE/JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENNEDY v. COMM. CITY OF PHILA, PA. et al
as 2:2011cv07881
Petitioner:
ROBERT N. KENNEDY
Respondent:
COMM. CITY OF PHILA, PA., JOEL S. JOHNSON and BETH OSWALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
