Cases 71 - 80 of 172
Blair v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2018cv00363
Defendant:
Michael Whalen, Andrew J. Tarkowski, Town of Clay and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Blair
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toste et al v. Filippov et al
as 1:2018cv01761
Plaintiff:
Malik Selby, Miguel Diaz, Frederick Batista and others
Defendant:
Administration at Blake Mica Shelter, Blake Mica Shelter (DHS) and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. Westchester Medical Center
as 1:2017cv09746
Plaintiff:
Myles Deante Clay Harris
Defendant:
Westchester Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garcia v. Womack
as 1:2017cv05628
Plaintiff:
Orlando R. Garcia
Defendant:
Clay James Womack
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
United States of America v. Approximately Four Hundred Fifty (450) Ancient Cuneiform Tablets et al
as 1:2017cv03980
Defendant:
Approximately Four Hundred Fifty (450) Ancient Cuneiform Tablets and Approximately Three Thousand (3,000) Ancient Clay Bullae
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
Justiniano et al v. First Student Management LLC et al
as 6:2017cv06297
Plaintiff:
Daniel Justiniano , Dana Lattimore , Cierra Ingram and others
Defendant:
First Student Management LLC and First Student, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Clay v. Clay
as 1:2017cv00228
Plaintiff:
Dino Victor Clay
Defendant:
Nahkema Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidmore v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al
as 1:2017cv01394
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc and Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co
Plaintiff:
Clay Shannon Tidmore , Jamie Tidmore Dey and Lee Tidmore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
