Cases 71 - 80 of 3,633
Jerome Patelunas, II v. Estate of Anthony Lupas Jr., et al
as 24-1084
Plaintiff:
JEROME J. PATELUNAS, II
Defendant:
ESTATE OF ANTHONY LUPAS JR., ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, UNKNOWN CO-CONSPIRATORS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LUZERNE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU
USA, et al v. Google LLC
as 24-5006
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of Arkansas, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Other:
Brad Greenspan
DiValentino v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Anthony J. DiValentino
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PLUMMER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PLUMMER
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Harris v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 1:2023cv02150
Petitioner:
Keeba Harris
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BROWN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv02157
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BROWN
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
