Cases 71 - 80 of 236
Stevenson v. Cermak Health Services of Cook County et al
as 1:2018cv05696
Defendant:
Judge Jane Doe, Cermak Health Services of Cook County and Cook County Health and Hospitals System
Plaintiff:
Elston Stevenson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv05804
Plaintiff:
Andre Hall
Defendant:
John Doe, Superintendent Hayes, Cermak Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bobel v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05475
Defendant:
Tom S Dart and Cermak Health Services of Cook County
Plaintiff:
Joseph Harry Bobel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv05629
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Lisa Madigan, Cook County Jail Administration and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Steven Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv04997
Defendant:
R. Hinton, Cermak Health Services, Thomas Dart and others
Plaintiff:
James Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2018cv03270
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Thompson
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, Barbara Davis and Taiwo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Madigan et al
as 1:2018cv02843
Plaintiff:
Todd Steven Adams
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan, Illinois Circuit Court Administration, Cook County Sheriff's Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv02127
Plaintiff:
Ahmad A. Ahmad
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cermak Health Services, C/O Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01895
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Bennett
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Dept Of Corrections and Cermak Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gurley v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv01383
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Robert Gurley
Defendant:
John Doe, Mr. Hubber, Ms. Gotay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
