Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC. v. 76 Acres et al
as 1:2014cv00110
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
Defendant:
76 Acres, Lambert G. Boyce, Jr., Ledley Byrd Boyce and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Smith-El v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv03870
Plaintiff:
Russell Smith-El
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Mark W. Hale, Paul Matera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv03772
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02994
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Coles v. Visnick
as 1:2013cv02038
Plaintiff:
Resheed Coles
Defendant:
Visnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Shearin et al
as 1:2013cv01547
Petitioner:
Keith Edmonds
Respondent:
Bobby Shearin, Sandy Cole and The Attorney General Of The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Webb et al
as 1:2013cv01403
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Young
Defendant:
Wayne Webb, J. Michael Stouffer, Ronald R. Brezler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colely v. USA - 2255
as 8:2013cv00583
Petitioner:
Casey Colely
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Coles v. Visnick
as 1:2013cv00325
Plaintiff:
Resheed Coles
Defendant:
Visnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tejan-Cole v. Carleton East Operating Co, LLC et al
as 8:2012cv03007
Plaintiff:
Aminata Tejan-Cole
Defendant:
Carleton East Operating Co, LLC and Bluestone Management Services Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
