Cases 71 - 80 of 315
Shawnee County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners v. Allergan PLC et al
as 5:2020cv04022
Defendant:
Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Michael Babich, Mylan Institutional, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnee County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dechant v. Grayson et al
as 2:2020cv02183
Defendant:
Calvin Pfannensteil, Jr., James Grayson, Does 1 to 10 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Dechant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bradley v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03082
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, (fnu) Jones, (fnu) David and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Carter Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speer (ID 96901) v. Beardsley et al
as 5:2020cv03075
Defendant:
(fnu) Barr, (fnu) Jiles, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Speer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florez v. Ash et al
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe 4, John or Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Florez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lynn (ID 64377) v. Aramark, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv03046
Defendant:
(fnu) Hackney, Roger Werholtz, Johnnie Goddard and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson (ID 79020) v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2020cv03017
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Johnnie Goddard, Jennifer L. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. Shirmekas et al
as 5:2020cv03019
Defendant:
Server Doe (1) and (fnu) Shirmekas
Plaintiff:
John Dewey Lim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oklahoma Genetics, Inc. v. Francis et al
as 6:2019cv01341
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Genetics, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Francis, John Does 1-25 and M & S Francis Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321
Delaney (ID 72292) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2019cv03221
Defendant:
Danny R. Hornburger, Dylan H. Darter, Sam Cline and others
Plaintiff:
John K. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
