Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Cunningham v. Endless Access LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Endless Access LLC, Endless Access Distributors, LLC, Saveonresorts.com, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Goodwin v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Goodwin
Defendant:
NCO Financial Systems, Inc. and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KASHIN v. NRA GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
ANDREY KASHIN
Defendant:
NRA GROUP, LLC, NATIONAL RECOVERY AGENCY and DOE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Peach et al v. Knox County Schools et al (TV2)
as 3:2014cv00369
Plaintiff:
John H. Peach and Bill French
Defendant:
Knox County Schools , James P McIntyre, Jr , Michael F. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
York v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02525
Plaintiff:
Charles York
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick Schofield, Jerry Lester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyree v. U.S. Bank, NA et al
as 2:2014cv02476
Plaintiff:
Maurice Tyree
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, NA and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Varner v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2014cv00196
Defendant:
Loudon County, Loudon County Sheriff's Department, Timothy W Guider and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Varner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Varner v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2014cv00195
Defendant:
Loudon County, Loudon County Sheriff's Department, Tim Guider and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Varner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Martin v. M and T Bank et al
as 2:2014cv02145
Plaintiff:
Charley Mae Martin
Defendant:
M and T Bank , Wilson & Associates, P.L.L.C. and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Woods v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, et al.
as 3:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Stuart Woods
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
