Cases 71 - 80 of 2,095
Ablorh v. Town of Stoneham et al
as 1:2023cv11937
Plaintiff:
Akweley Ablorh
Defendant:
Town of Stoneham, Lt. David Stefanelli, Sheryl Rotondi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rice v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2023cv11940
Plaintiff:
Jordan M. Rice
Defendant:
Steven Kennedy, Michael Amaral, Amanda Rautenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Kearley v. Covidien L.P. et al
as 1:2023cv11888
Plaintiff:
David Kearley
Defendant:
Covidien L.P. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nichols v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11736
Plaintiff:
David John Nichols
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Agneta v. Mici et al
as 4:2023cv40085
Plaintiff:
David Agneta
Defendant:
Carol Mici, Sergio Servello, Lewis Evangelidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Agneta v. Mici et al
as 4:2023cv11664
Plaintiff:
David Agneta
Defendant:
Carol Mici, Sergio Servello, Lew Evangelidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardaneh v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2023cv11637
Plaintiff:
Hamid Reza Ardaneh
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, David Derkin, District Attorney Ceara Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2023cv11600
Plaintiff:
David R. Lewis
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rhoden v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 1:2023cv11584
Plaintiff:
David Rhoden
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
