Cases 71 - 80 of 2,852
Friend v. FBI
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
FBI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MacLloyd v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
David Erike MacLloyd
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Friend v. Puckett
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Brittany R. Puckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friend v. Staff
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erie Insurance Property and Casualty Company v. Hinkle
as 1:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Erie Insurance Property and Casualty Company
Respondent:
David L. Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Linder v. United States
as 3:2022cv00139
Petitioner:
David Linder
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ferguson et al v. The Chemours Company FC LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Deidra Ferguson and David Ferguson
Defendant:
The Chemours Company FC LLC, Kuraray America, Inc., Does 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McGraw v. McDowell County Commission et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
James Thomas McGraw
Defendant:
McDowell County Commission, Sgt. Aaron Cantrell, Corporal Nicholas Culbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Alan Myers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Buzzard v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
David Buzzard
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
