Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Reames v. Casagrande et al
as 2:2011cv02949
Plaintiff:
Orlando Reames
Defendant:
Casagrande, Baldridge, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00023
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00916
Plaintiff:
James M. Morris
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D. Schofield, Reuben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2011cv00524
Plaintiff:
Jeff White
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, (f/n/u) Alexander, Madubueze Novozo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Steele et al
as 2:2011cv02297
Plaintiff:
Molly Dye
Defendant:
Jewel Steele, Sharon C. Taylor and Derrick D. Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dye v. Steele et al
as 3:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Molly Dye
Defendant:
Jewel Steele, Sharon C. Taylor and Derrick D. Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Tennessee Department of Correction
as 3:2011mc00022
Plaintiff:
Jeff White
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, (f/n/u) Alexander, Madubueze Novozo and others
DAngelo v. Schofield et al
as 7:2011cv00003
Plaintiff:
Campanella DAngelo
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, William Danforth, Ted Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Arrington et al
as 1:2010cv01528
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jones
Defendant:
Stanley Arrington, R. Hall, J. Whitting and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
