Cases 71 - 80 of 174
Pathak v. Lobel's of New York, LLC A New York Foreign Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv02480
Defendant:
Rose Fraum, Stephen Fraum, Evan Lobel and others
Plaintiff:
Anshu Bharat Pathak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Watkins et al v. Teuton et al
as 2:2016cv02446
Defendant:
Frank Aguilar-Morfin, Jack B Ames, Carrie Black and others
Plaintiff:
Alisha Ruby Ortiz and Pele La Cruz Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Evans v. Armenta et al
as 2:2016ms00049
Defendant:
Scott Aguilar, Ramiro Armenta, DJB Fortune Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Robb Evans
Evans v. USA
as 2:2016cv01397
Petitioner:
Marvin Duane Evans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hudson v. Evans et al
as 3:2016cv00169
Defendant:
David Evans, Brian Gaston, Martin Obos and others
Plaintiff:
James Gary Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Hice et al
as 2:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Edmond Evans
Defendant:
Hank, Hice and Metro Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Malinchak International, Inc. v. Suzanne Evans et al
as 2:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Malinchak International, Inc.
Defendant:
Suzanne Evans and Suzanne Evans Coaching, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Donatell v. City of Las Vegas et al
as 2:2015cv02334
Defendant:
Norma Alicia-Carpio, Vickie Athukorala, Jane Balao and others
Plaintiff:
Judy Donatell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WSOF Asia Limited v. MMAWC, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02065
Defendant:
Ali Abdel Aziz, Colorado Limited Liability Partnership, Bruce Deifik and others
Plaintiff:
WSOF Asia, Holdings Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
