Cases 71 - 80 of 128
ANDRIE et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv05059
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ANDRIE , MARY LOU ANDRIE , ROSS BRUPBACHER and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100, INCLUSIVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DICKERSON et al v. PRINCE TELECOM, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02581
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DICKERSON , WILFREDO ACEVEDO , PEDRO ALICEA and others
Defendant:
PRINCE TELECOM, LLC, OCEAN CABLE GROUP INC. and ROBERT MILLS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FOLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2012cv00116
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MAURICE F. FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Foley v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2012cv00538
Petitioner:
Maurice Foley
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Pennsylvania Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv00446
Plaintiff:
SEAN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN CRICHTON, SEAN FOLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES et al v. FOLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE S. JAMES and MARILYN JAMES
Defendant:
MARYBETH FOLEY and JOHN FOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48840
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM R. FOLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FOLEY v. HOLDINGS ACQUISITION COMPANY, L.P.
as 2:2011cv01105
Plaintiff:
JANET FOLEY
Defendant:
HOLDINGS ACQUISITION COMPANY, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
FOLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44018
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. FOLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
FOLEY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv34498
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. FOLEY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
