Cases 71 - 80 of 175
Fowler v. Nealy et al
as 1:2017cv02239
Plaintiff:
Donald Fowler
Defendant:
Gregory Nealy , New York Minute Trucking, Inc. and RLI Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fowler v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Andrea Lynn Fowler
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PERALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CALIFORNIA STATE OF, UNITED STATES ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bergeron v. Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number One (1) et al
as 1:2017cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Bergeron
Defendant:
Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number One (1), Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number Two (2), Unknown Public Defender of Cherokee County Number Three (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Camden Property Trust et al
as 1:2017cv01655
Defendant:
Camden Property Trust , Camden Vantage, LLC and Fowler, Hein, Cheatwood & Williams, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Krystal Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stephens v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv04579
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Stephens
Defendant:
State of Georgia, State Bar of Georgia , State Bar of Georgia Office of General Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Bryson et al
as 6:2016cv00057
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Brian Owens, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
