Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 212
BANKS v. MANNING et al
as 2:2015mc00882
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: JEFFREY A. MANNING, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PITTSBURGH MUNICIPAL COURT and others
BANKS v. CESSOR et al
as 2:2015mc00877
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON, GREGORY C. MELUCCI and others
BANKS v. BABBCOCK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01584
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: BRIAN BABBCOCK, MARK HORNAK, ADRIAN N. ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv01498
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: ORLANDO HARPER, ROBERT CESSOR, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01400
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01385
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BANKS v. HICKMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv01342
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: DAVID HICKMAN, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PERDENE et al
as 2:2015cv01346
Petitioner: FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent: WARDEN PERDENE, ORLANDO HARPER, US ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. CONTI et al
as 2:2015cv01341
Plaintiff: FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant: JOY FLOWERS CONTI, US DIST COURT FOR THE WEST DIST OF PA, TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Perdene et al
as 1:2015cv01854
Petitioner: Frederick Banks
Respondent: Perdene, Orlando Harper, U.S. Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?