Cases 71 - 80 of 180
GONZALEZ et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv02827
Plaintiff:
AMIE GONZALEZ and GEORGE LUIS GONZALEZ
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and COOK INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lohnes v. Gonzalez Jr. et al
as 2:2018cv00324
Defendant:
45G04-1603-MR-00003, Marce Gonzalez Jr., 45G04-1601-F5-00006 and others
Plaintiff:
James Andrew Lohnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00153
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. BULLER et al
as 1:2018cv02165
Plaintiff:
GONZALEZ and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
LOVE'S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC, BURTON, PLAZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GONZALEZ et al v. LOVE'S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC
as 1:2018cv02164
Plaintiff:
ANNA LIZA GONZALEZ and GILBERTO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
LOVE'S TRAVEL STOPS & COUNTRY STORES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ward v. Hammond Police Dept. et al
as 2:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Lashon Ward
Defendant:
Hammond Police Dept., Eusebio Gonzalez and M. Darnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Menard, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00240
Plaintiff:
Alicia Gonzalez
Defendant:
Menard, Inc. , Thyssenkrupp Elevator Company and Skyway Elevator Repair Co Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCASTER v. CARTER et al
as 2:2018cv00251
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, D. ARONLD, LAURA BODKIN and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOE MCCASTER
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GONZALEZ v. LANDES FOODS, LLC
as 1:2018cv00196
Plaintiff:
ADAM GONZALEZ
Defendant:
LANDES FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
