Cases 71 - 80 of 204
Hamilton v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv13693
Petitioner:
Jerome Adam Hamilton
Respondent:
United States of America
Rhodes v. Does 1-5 et al
as 5:2017cv13676
Plaintiff:
Jabari Shababu Rhodes
Defendant:
Does 1-5, Ronald Giles, DA and others
New Hamilton Liquor Store, Inc. et al v. AmGuard Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv13077
Defendant:
AmGuard Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
New Hamilton Liquor Store, Inc. and Mr. K & Hamilton, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Enjoi Transportation, LLC et al v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2017cv13052
Plaintiff:
Enjoi Transportation, LLC and Paulette Hamilton
Defendant:
City of Detroit , Transdev Services, Inc. , Martin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
United States of America v. Hamilton
as 2:2017mc51044
Defendant:
John Hamilton
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Movant:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 324
Hamilton v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00660
Defendant:
Fifth Third Mortagage-MI, LLC, Federal Home Loan Morgage Corp., Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Lansing Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00641
Plaintiff:
Anthony Young
Defendant:
Unknown Perock and Nancy Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRUZ et al v. Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C. et al
as 2:2017cv12116
Plaintiff:
JOYCE CRUZ , A. C.1. , A. C.2. and others
Defendant:
Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, P.C., Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam, Inc., LEO A. DALY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Commissioner
as 2:2017cv11551
Plaintiff:
Ruth Hope Hamilton
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Hamilton III v. SSA
as 2:2017cv11041
Plaintiff:
Lincoln H Hamilton III
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
