Cases 71 - 80 of 147
Smith v. Sparkman et al
as 1:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ricky Smith
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman , Ron King , Regina Hancock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowdec LLC v. Hancock Fabrics Inc
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
Rowdec LLC
Defendant:
Hancock Fabrics Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Hancock et al
as 1:2012cv00221
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tenia Hancock, Jacqueline Ann Lee, Cynthia Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Parker et al v. Higher One Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
Ashley B. Parker , Bailey Bates , Rachel Hancock and others
Defendant:
Higher One Holdings, Inc. and The Bancorp Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock v. City of Greenwood, Mississippi et al
as 4:2012cv00055
Plaintiff:
John Hancock
Defendant:
City of Greenwood, Mississippi , Byron Granderson and Jesse Amos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holzhauser et al v. Alfonso et al
as 1:2012cv00185
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Holzhauser, II and T. D. H.
Defendant:
Margaret Alfonso, Cono Caranna, Brehm T. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hancock Fabrics, Inc. v. Rowdec, LLC
as 1:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Hancock Fabrics, Inc.
Defendant:
Rowdec, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jourdan River Estates, LLC et al v. Hancock County et al
as 1:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jourdan River Estates, LLC and Jourdan River Resort and Yacht Club, LLC
Defendant:
Hancock County, Hancock County Board of Supervisors, Lisa Cowand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Hancock Bank
as 1:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
James Norris Walker
Defendant:
Hancock Bank
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Carter v. Epps et al
as 2:2012cv00013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Antonio Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Regina Hancock, Erin Bounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
