Cases 71 - 80 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Del Rio et al v. Obama et al
as 4:2014mc02377
Plaintiff:
N Del Rio and Victor Del Rio
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Cole and others
Jun-En Enterprises, et al v. Peter Lin, et al
as 14-56613
Appellant:
RUSSELL JAMES COLE
Plaintiff-counter-defendant:
JUN-EN ENTERPRISE, a Taiwan corporation and AGAPE INDUSTRY CO., LTD, a Taiwan corporation
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee:
PETER K. LIN and AGAPE INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Third-party-defendant:
SHI RU YANG and SHIU-YING LU
Del Rio v. Obama
as 4:2014mc02378
Plaintiff:
N. Del Rio
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Cole and others
TITLE INDUSTRY ASSURANCE COMPANY, RRG v. PARK AVENUE ABSTRACT, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv04060
Plaintiff:
TITLE INDUSTRY ASSURANCE COMPANY, RRG
Defendant:
PARK AVENUE ABSTRACT, INC., RICHARD RONEY, DONALD LUCIANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
N. Del Rio b.n.f. Victor Del Rio v. Holder et al
as 4:2014mc01305
Plaintiff:
N. Del Rio b.n.f. Victor Del Rio
Defendant:
Eric Holder, James Cole, Tony West and others
Del Rio v Holder et al
as 4:2014mc01289
Movant:
Victor Del Rio and ND
Respondent:
Eric Holder, James Cole, Tony West and others
COLE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2014cv02987
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jun-En Enterprise, et al v. Peter Lin, et al
as 14-55692
Plaintiff:
JUN-EN ENTERPRISE, a Taiwan corporation and AGAPE INDUSTRY CO., LTD, a Taiwan corporation
Appellant:
RUSSELL JAMES COLE
Appellee:
PETER K. LIN and AGAPE INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Defendant:
SHI RU YANG and SHIU-YING LU
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
