Cases 71 - 80 of 478
Wheatley v. Cherokee County, Kansas et al
as 5:2021cv03162
Plaintiff:
Chad Wheatley and Chad Garrett
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Kansas, Sheriff David Groves, Michelle Tippie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schulz v. Nicholson et al
as 5:2021cv03159
Plaintiff:
Trey Lee Schulz
Defendant:
Travis Nicholson, Bill Travis, Denise Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03149
Respondent:
Kansas, State of, John Doe, Roger Soldan and others
Petitioner:
Craig Ivan Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brownfield v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al.
as 6:2021cv01157
Defendant:
John Doe (1), Chantel L. Abel, Nancy Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Allen Brownfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Lawson et al
as 5:2021cv03132
Defendant:
John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Clinton Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. Greenwood County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 5:2021cv04034
Defendant:
Christine Mouer, John Doe, Greenwood County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 5:2021cv03106
Plaintiff:
DeRon McCoy, Jr.
Defendant:
M. Fellig, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cline v. State of Missouri et al
as 5:2021cv03069
Defendant:
Wyandotte County Adult Detention Center, John Doe LLC, Rachel Draper and others
Plaintiff:
Cory Deshawn Cline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harland v. Kansas City, Kansas Police Department
as 2:2021cv02060
Plaintiff:
Ikem Harland
Defendant:
Kansas City, Kansas Police Department, John Doe (1), Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toman et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 6:2021cv01028
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Frank Toman and Judy Toman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
