Cases 71 - 80 of 118
MENDOZA v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv03909
Petitioner:
JAIME MENDOZA
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAWALBEH v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv03693
Petitioner:
FAHED TAWALBEH
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLEMAN v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv03509
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HENRY COLEMAN
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Motolo v. Grondolsky et al
as 9:2009cv00789
Plaintiff:
Perry F. Motolo
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, Rick Herbik and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIROLLO v. THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv03034
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE PIROLLO
Respondent:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ARNEL DAVIS v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv02882
Petitioner:
DEWEY ARNEL DAVIS
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GATTO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv02877
Petitioner:
JOHN A. GATTO
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JEFF GRONDOLSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRUCE v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv02669
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BRUCE
Respondent:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MUHAMMED v. GRONDOLSKY
as 1:2009cv02653
Plaintiff:
FAHIM MUHAMMED
Defendant:
JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Gadson v. Jeff Grondolsky, et al
as 09-1644
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT V. GADSON
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROLYN A. SABOL and JEFF GRONDOLSKY
Respondent:
JOHN D. COLAUTTI, Record Office Manager and UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
