Cases 71 - 80 of 1,863
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Jones and Mr. Joseph B. Stallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. M.D. Powers, Mr. Joseph B. Stallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Ms. R.D. Young, Mr. Joseph B. Stallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 7:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Eads v. Tatum et al
as 7:2023cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jerry Eads
Defendant:
K. Tatum and Lt. Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krug v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Krug
Defendant:
Mr. Harold Clarke, Ms. Beth Cabell, Mr. Kemsy Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
