Cases 71 - 80 of 221
SCHLEMMER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2015cv01583
Petitioner:
LAUREL MICHELE SCHLEMMER
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ORLANDO HARPER, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Kane et al
as 3:2015cv02175
Petitioner:
Reginald C. Scott
Respondent:
Kathleen Kane and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NOONAN et al v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv06082
Plaintiff:
FRANK NOONAN , RANDY FEATHERS , RICHARD A. SHEETZ, JR. and others
Defendant:
KATHLEEN KANE , MICHAEL MILETTO , CHRISTOPHER BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2015cv01449
Petitioner:
LAVON CECIL SMITH
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRIGHTWELL v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (ET.AL.)
as 1:2015cv00263
Petitioner:
BOBBY BRIGHTWELL
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, (ET.AL.), PENNSYLVANIA PROBATION AND PAROLE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOSTER v. KANE et al
as 2:2015cv05871
Appellant:
RODMEN R. FOSTER
Appellee:
KATHLEEN KANE, MICHAEL C. POTTEIGER and JOHN E. WETZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tarapchak et al v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2015cv02078
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Tarapchak and Joseph Pilchesky
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Joseph P. Kalinowski, Kathleen Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05487
Petitioner:
JASON PARKER
Respondent:
BRENDA TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURKHARDT v. KERESTES et al
as 5:2015cv05497
Petitioner:
GEORGE W. BURKHARDT
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, CRAIG W. STEDMAN and KATHLEEN KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2015cv01284
Petitioner:
KEITH WOOD
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ , KNOTTS , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
