Cases 71 - 80 of 356
THOMPSON v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2019cv01795
Defendant:
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION and HEIDI R. KING
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. THOMPSON, III
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
DURU v. HCA - CORPORATE HEADQUARTER, NASHVILLE - TN et al
as 1:2019mc00094
Defendant:
ROBERT SCHREINER, KAISER PERMANENTE GEORGIA, PORTER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv01365
Plaintiff:
NICK R. SMITH, HRM KING NICODEMUS and NICKI RAY SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
KING et al v. HOOST, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01313
Defendant:
ANIS AMRI, HOOST, LLC and HOOST, LLC doing business as NOMAD HOOKAH BAR
Plaintiff:
BRANDY JACKSON and ERIKA KING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KING v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01196
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MEMBRENO et al v. Y&S ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00929
Defendant:
JUNG KOO WOO, YUN KI HAN, YOUNG JOO WOO and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE OMAR MARTINEZ, FIDEL EDENILSON MEMBRENO, JUAN PORTILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KING v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019mc00031
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOHN KING
CLERMONT v. SOOTER et al
as 1:2019cv00314
Defendant:
JAKE FERRER, RICCARDO MARTINEZ, DEVIN COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL CLERMONT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRISON v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2019cv00269
Defendant:
VUKELICH, ERIC WILSON, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HENRY HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
