Cases 71 - 80 of 114
Praylow v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 0:2011cv00407
Petitioner:
Al-Tericke Praylow
Respondent:
Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. South Carolina
as 2:2011cv00406
Petitioner:
John X Bell
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moss v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 2:2010cv02300
Petitioner:
Corey Moss
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wayne Leneau v. Warden, Kershaw Correctional
as 10-6793
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE DOUGLAS LENEAU
Respondent - Appellee:
KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Singletary v. South Carolina, State of
as 8:2010cv01305
Petitioner:
Willie James Singletary
Respondent:
Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William McKinnedy, III v. Cecil Reynold
as 10-6456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CLAYTON MCKINNEDY, III
Defendant - Appellee:
CECIL REYNOLDS, Warden at Kershaw Correctional Institution and et al., ROBERT E. WARD, a/k/a Bob Ward, JON OZMINT and others
Robert Smart v. Cecilia Reynolds
as 10-6227
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE SMART, a/k/a Robert Smart, a/k/a Robert D Smart
Respondent - Appellee:
CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Robert Smart v. Cecilia Reynolds
as 09-8262
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT DALE SMART, a/k/a Robert Smart, a/k/a Robert D Smart
Respondent - Appellee:
CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden Kershaw Correctional Institution
Michael Chamberlain v. Kershaw Correctional Instituti
as 09-7976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHAMBERLAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
John Miller v. South Carolina Department
as 09-7751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ALAN MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, PATRICIA COOK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
