Cases 71 - 80 of 239
William Childers, Jr. v. Warden of Lieber Corr Inst
as 16-6534
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM LARRY CHILDERS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and BRIAN P. STERLING, SCDC Director
Michael Day v. Warden Lieber Corr Inst
as 16-6449
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL DWIGHT DAY
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF
Calvin Gaddy v. Warden of Lieber Correctional
as 16-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN LYNDALE GADDY, a/k/a Calvin L. Gaddy
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
SOUTH CAROLINA
Sumter v. Wilson
as 4:2016cv00739
Petitioner:
Eric Sumter
Respondent:
Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dunbar v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 9:2016cv00482
Petitioner:
Rusty Merritte Dunbar
Respondent:
Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Mills v. Warden Lieber Correctional In
as 15-7878
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN L. MILLS, John Lewis Mills
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Nixon v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2015cv04636
Petitioner:
Stufon Nixon
Respondent:
Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cleveland v. Cartledge et al
as 4:2015cv04512
Plaintiff:
George Cleveland, III
Defendant:
Larry Cartledge, I Mayes, M Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdiyyah Alkebulanyahh v. William Byars, Jr.
as 15-3
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABDIYYAH BEN ALKEBULANYAHH, f/k/a Tyree Alphonso Roberts
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Corrections and WAYNE C. MCCABE, Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
John Dykeman v. Warden Lieber Correctional
as 15-7713
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN DYKEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
