Cases 71 - 80 of 194
MCKINLEY v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00109
Defendant:
Dr. BAILEY, Mrs. BIGLIEGH, PA BLILA and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE MCKINLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. COLEMAN et al
as 2:2012cv00101
Defendant:
TERESER A. BANKS, F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, CHRISTOPHER A. GREINER and others
Interested Party:
JO ANN BARNHART and LONNIE G. SCHMIDT
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DAVID NEAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WRIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Defendant:
D. BURKS, J. CRUZ, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KILGORE v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2012cv00094
Defendant:
ADMIN. BEIGHLEY, WARDEN CHURCH, C.O. ESTEP and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. KILGORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWART v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00092
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Petitioner:
JESSE J. STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HINES v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00091
Defendant:
J. BIEGHLEY, ALEX JASTILLANO, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG N. HINES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
IRIZARRY-CENTENO v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00088
Petitioner:
ANGEL IRIZARRY-CENTENO
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WEBSTER v. LOCKETT
as 2:2012cv00086
Respondent:
CHARLES LOCKETT
Petitioner:
BRUCE CARNEIL WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WHITE v. SETZER et al
as 2:2012cv00082
Defendant:
MD ROGER JONES, WARDEN CHARLES LOCKETT, A. SETZER and others
Plaintiff:
VERNON WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONE v. DRUMMY et al
as 2:2012cv00080
Defendant:
JULIE BEIGHLY, MR. DRUMMY, CHARLES LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
LAVELL BONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
