Cases 71 - 80 of 234
Glover v. Deer Ridge Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2019cv01602
Defendant:
Assistant Director Michael Gower, Mr. Read, Mr. Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Darin A. Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv01136
Defendant:
Steven Boston, Lt Chambers, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Ellison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Emery v. Nooth et al
as 2:2019cv01070
Defendant:
Lt. R. A. Young, M. Andrews, A. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Emery, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2019cv00995
Defendant:
Matthew Ingram, David Kovachevich, Dr. Michael Seale and others
Plaintiff:
Cyrus Andrew Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tijerina v. Rogers et al
as 2:2019cv00700
Defendant:
J. Tovar, Heather Nevil, B. Amsberry and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Tijerina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Washburn et al
as 2:2019cv00655
Defendant:
Captain Frazier, Ms. Kelly Rath, Sue Washburn and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Bauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pompa v. Bowser et al
as 2:2019cv00628
Plaintiff:
David S. Pompa, Santiago Jose Pompa and James Sebastian
Defendant:
Troy Bowser, C.O. Swuart, Sargent G. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv00572
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene and Lt. S. McGann
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bondick v. City of Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv00521
Defendant:
City of Eugene Police Department, Officer N Baillas, Lt. S McGann and others
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Bondick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byers v. Hughs et al
as 2:2019cv00429
Defendant:
Amber Terry, Asst. Supt. Jackson, Lt. Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jerome Byers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
