Cases 71 - 80 of 150
In Re: Question of Law
as 6:2016cv00138
Movant:
USA
Respondent:
Question of Law
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United Guaranty Commercial Insurance v. Despot
as 2:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
United Guaranty Commercial Insurance
Defendant:
Susan M. Despot
Counter_defendant:
Slovin & Associates Attorneys at Law, Student Loan Corporation, CitiAssist and others
Counter_claimant:
Susan M. Despot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mitchell v. Franklin Law Group PSC
as 3:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
James Mitchell
Defendant:
Franklin Law Group PSC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lovette v. Bowen et al
as 3:2016cv00258
Plaintiff:
Steven Lovette
Defendant:
Neil Bowen, Dan Miller, M. Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Law Office of Rick Jones, PLLC v. Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 5:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Law Office of Rick Jones, PLLC
Defendant:
Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Stuart v. Zielke Law Firm, PLLC
as 3:2016cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stuart
Defendant:
Zielke Law Firm, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
King v. Harwood et al
as 3:2015cv00762
Plaintiff:
Susan Jean King
Defendant:
Todd Harwood , Vic Hubbuch , Chad White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv00065
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Nevada-Martinez et al v. Ahmad et al
as 5:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Porfirio Nevada-Martinez , Carlos Alberto Macias-Ramirez , John and Jane Does and others
Defendant:
Weal Ahmad , Anna Garcia and Ahmad Law Office, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
