Cases 71 - 80 of 127
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017at00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bonilla v. Madera County Grand Jury
as 3:2017cv06333
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Madera County Grand Jury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Jones, et al v. Michael Keitz, et al
as 17-16788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD JONES, JOHN CAYANNE and JIM GLASSCOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KEITZ, JOHN ANDERSON, Sheriff, ROBERT BIEHM and others
Bonilla v. Madera County Superior Court
as 3:2017cv03733
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Madera County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. County of Madera et al
as 1:2017cv00849
Plaintiff:
Roseanna Page
Defendant:
County of Madera, Madera County Department of Corrections, Madera County Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. County of Madera et al
as 1:2017at00491
Plaintiff:
Roseanna Page
Defendant:
County of Madera, Madera County Department of Corrections, Madera County Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sienze v. Madera County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 1:2017cv00736
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Sienze
Defendant:
Madera County Sheriff's Office, Matthew J. Kutz, Ion Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Madera County v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd et al
as 6:2017mc00056
Plaintiff:
Madera County Public Administrator
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc
Ronald Jones et al v. Michael Keitz et al
as 1:2016cv01725
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones , John Cayanne and Jim Glasscock
Defendant:
Michael Keitz, John Anderson, Robert Biehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Keitz et al
as 1:2016at00944
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jones , John Cayanne and Jim Glasscock
Defendant:
Michael Keitz, John Anderson, Robert Biehm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
