Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 384
Roberts v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, et al
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant: Meijer, Inc., Jane Doe and Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Plaintiff: Suzanne Roberts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Actos Direct Purchaser
as 20-2002
Plaintiff / Appellee: American Sales Company, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc., Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc. and others
In Re: American Express Anti-S We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1766
Plaintiff: National Supermarkets Association, Inc., on behalf of its membership, and all other similarly situated persons, Clam Lake Partners LLC, James Eaton and others
Intervenor: Gander Mountain Company, Circuit City Liquidating Trust, Holiday Companies and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Qwik Lube LLC and LaJolla Auto Tech, Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc,
Defendant: Susan Burdette
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine
as 20-1603
Respondent: MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, Self Insured Schools of California, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Walgreen Co. and others
Petitioner: Allergan Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02300
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cundiff v. Meijer, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00240
Plaintiff: Doris Cundiff
Defendant: Meijer, Inc., Meijer Group, Inc., Meijer Companies, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2005
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, SUPERVALU, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2006
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., VALUE DRUG COMPANY, KROGER COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, MICHIGAN REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, RANBAXY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 15-2007
Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 595 HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, ARCADIAN HEALTH PLAN OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC, MCKESSON CORPORATION, CHRISTOPHER WIRTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE, ASTRAZENECA AB and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HEB GROCERY CO. LP, RITE AID HEADQUARTERS CORPORATION, ECKERD CORPORATION and others
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Amicus Curiae: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01154
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?