Cases 71 - 80 of 3,498
Sproles v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael William Sproles
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Nationwide Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Darlene McCoy
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Michael Hatfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc. v. Regan
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Ergon-West Virginia, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan
Vonehl v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Vonehl
Defendant:
S. Lovett, Office of Inspector General and Federal Bureau of Prisons Central Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Persinger et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 5:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Glen Michael Persinger and Sara Jane Persinger
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hayden v. Searles et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayden
Defendant:
Mr. Shelby Searles and Matthew Briske, SGT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairbanks v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00058
Petitioner:
Michael Fairbanks
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Terrell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
