Cases 71 - 80 of 317
Murphy v. GRACO Childrens Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03030
Defendant:
Newell Brands DTC, Inc. and GRACO Childrens Products, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Murphy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Hairston Woods et al v. Murphy
as 1:2020cv02979
Plaintiff:
Sureste Property Services and Hairston Woods
Defendant:
Christopher Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy et al v. P.A.M. Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02800
Defendant:
P.A.M. Transport, Inc., Cherokee Insurance Company and Franklin Ollie
Plaintiff:
Melissa Murphy and Jam'ias Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Stone et al
as 1:2020cv02414
Defendant:
Unknown Black Officer, Officer Tyler Pilgrim, Deputy Sheriff Pena and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Jermaine Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy El v. Chrysler Capital, et al
as 2:2020cv00048
Defendant:
Michael Manley and Chrysler Capital
Plaintiff:
Willie Barthel Murphy El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Hairston Woods et al v. Murphy
as 1:2020cv01158
Plaintiff:
Sureste Property Services and Hairston Woods
Defendant:
Christopher Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Atlanta Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv01084
Defendant:
Paul Howard, Atlanta Police Department, Britt Pinion and others
Plaintiff:
Elkenno Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00035
Plaintiff:
OLIVER MICHAEL MURPHY
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURPHY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2020cv00066
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE LASHONDA MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
