Cases 71 - 80 of 577
United Financial Casualty Company v. Premo et al
as 3:2022cv00540
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Matthew Premo, Premo Concrete Construction, Edward Montanucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Cirello v. Riedel et al
as 2:2022cv01830
Plaintiff:
Robert Guy Cirello
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Riedel, Jacqueline Gravatt, NLVPO2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Houston v. L.B.B.S. et al
as 2:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
L.B.B.S., Daniel Schwartz, Calvin Johnson and others
Alexander v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01760
Plaintiff:
Matthew L Alexander
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Houston v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01745
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and Unknown Defendants
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 2:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies and Dianne Ferrante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brundage v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01670
Plaintiff:
Gary Earl Brundage
Defendant:
Matthew Johnson, Darren Cox and Church Of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
