Cases 71 - 80 of 7,150
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cucunubo Perez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2428
Petitioner:
JOSE RICARDO CUCUNUBO PEREZ, YULI ANDREA MEDINA GONZALEZ, CHRISTIAN RICHARD CUCUNUBO MEDINA and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medina (PS) v. Bauby
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Delano Medina
Defendant:
August Bauby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv03007
Plaintiff:
Ekata Stella Abebe, Godwin Robin Abebe and Director Christopher A. Wray
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Martha Medina-Maltes
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Baisden et al v. Life Line Screening of America Ltd et al
as 3:2024cv02173
Plaintiff:
Tynia Baisden, Fantasia Hilliard, Alona Jennings and others
Defendant:
Life Line Screening of America Ltd and Eric McGrath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Medina Garcia v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Hector Manuel Medina Garcia
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Garland
as 24-2246
Petitioner:
JESUS MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medina v. First Convenience National Bank, Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Esther Medina
Defendant:
First Convenience National Bank, Texas and Nation Wide Insurance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina v. Butera's Forno Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02604
Plaintiff:
Marcos Medina
Defendant:
Butera's Forno Inc., Martin Butera, Gary Butera and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
