Cases 71 - 80 of 81
LORENZO v. POWER
as 3:2008cv04079
Petitioner:
EDWIN LORENZO
Respondent:
T. MICHAEL POWER
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
William Tozer v. Michael Power, et al
as 08-3259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM TOZER
Defendant:
ATTY GEN NJ, ANNE MILGRAM and MICHAEL POWER
Arioste Moncion v. Mike Power
as 08-2983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARIOSTE MONCION
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL POWER, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison
Not Party - Appellee:
ATTY GEN NJ
Defendant - Rule 43 Substitution:
TERRANCE MOORE
TORRES v. POWER et al
as 2:2008cv02815
Petitioner:
OBED TORRES
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SONNTAG v. POWERS et al
as 2:2008cv01952
Petitioner:
CHARLES SONNTAG
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jose Camilo v. Michael Powers, et al
as 08-1493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CAMILO
Defendant:
MICHAEL POWERS, Administrator and STATE OF NJ
Snow et al v. Shoreline Restaurant Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02130
Plaintiff:
Randy Snow, Randy Snow, Michael Powers and others
Defendant:
Shoreline Restaurant Corporation and Bob L Clements
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WATSON v. POWERS et al
as 2:2007cv05499
Petitioner:
CARLYLE WATSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CAMILO v. POWERS et al
as 2:2007cv05479
Petitioner:
JOSE CAMILO
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWERS and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOSEPH v. POWER et al
as 2:2007cv02935
Petitioner:
LESLIE JOSEPH
Respondent:
MICHAEL POWER and STUART RABNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
