Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Rojas v. Pearson et al
as 2:2008cv02789
Plaintiff:
Roman Rojas
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Deborah Gonzales, Dorothy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pearson v. Phillips Screw Company et al
as 3:2008cv00953
Plaintiff:
James Pearson, James Pearson and James Pearson
Defendant:
Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Pearson v. Mangano et al
as 2:2008cv02504
Plaintiff:
Vita Evette Pearson and Vita Evette Pearson
Defendant:
Joy Mangano, Ingenious Designs, LLC and HSN, LP
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Evanovich et al
as 1:2008cv01157
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Janet Evanovich, Kathy Reichs, Ridley Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Barrow et al
as 2:2008cv02277
Petitioner:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Respondent:
John Barrow, Max Burn, Adam Toledano and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Todd v. Federal Correctional Center Memphis et al
as 2:2008cv02224
Plaintiff:
Xavier S. Todd
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Center Memphis, Jaun Castillo, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Barlow et al
as 2:2008cv02178
Plaintiff:
Terry Johnson
Defendant:
Revel Barlow, Arthur Robinson, Wanda Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dixon v. Pearson, et al
as 2:2008cv02112
Plaintiff:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Bruce Pearson, Dawson, Deborah Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Wright et al
as 2:2008cv02110
Plaintiff:
Watson Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
N. Wright, D. Smith, Bruce Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Risher v. Lappin et al
as 2:2008cv02038
Plaintiff:
Richard Carlton Risher
Defendant:
Harvey Lappin, Bruce Pearson, Sterling Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
