Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 71 - 80 of 230
Poli v. Pittston Area School District et al
as 3:2017cv00876
Plaintiff: Camille Poli
Defendant: Pittston Area School District , John Adonizio , John Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BABIY et al v. BRYN MAWR TRUST
as 2:2017cv01640
Plaintiff: P. THEODORE BABIY, ANNE MARIE E. QUINN and DIAMOND DEVELOMNET GROUP
Defendant: BRYN MAWR TRUST
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELLIOTT v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv00235
Plaintiff: AARON QUINN ELLIOTT
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
QUINN v. COLLEGE MANOR ASSOCIATES
as 5:2017cv00818
Plaintiff: KATELYN QUINN
Defendant: COLLEGE MANOR ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MOORE v. CITY OF LANCASTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00019
Plaintiff: RICHARD ANTHONY MOORE
Defendant: CITY OF LANCASTER, BOROUGH OF EPHRATA, PETER G. SHEPPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AYERS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv04339
Plaintiff: KEVIN AYERS
Defendant: THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. TORRES et al
as 2:2016cv04294
Plaintiff: PAUL MITCHELL
Defendant: SAMANTHA TORRES, LISSETTE CASERES, PATRICK QUINN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADDLESPURGER v. WECHT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01157
Plaintiff: STEVEN ADDLESPURGER
Defendant: DAVID WECHT, SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUINN v. USA
as 2:2016cv01023
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: BRANDON QUINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
BOWMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00897
Petitioner: QUINN BOWMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?